Planet engineering 1984, p.15
Plan[e]t Engineering (1984), page 15
surrender, and L ieu ten an t Kyle w ould never have done th a t.’’
“ Yes, he w as.”
“ But I co u ld n ’t think of it that way w hile he was alive.” 2900
looked at him thoughtfully. “ You know , you have som ething,
2910. A spark. S om ething the rest of us lack.” For a m om ent he
fingered his chin w ith one huge hand. “T h a t’s why I m ade you a
squad leader; that and to get you out of some work, because
som etimes you co u ld n ’t seem to keep up. B ut y o u ’ve that spark,
som ehow .”
2910 said, “ I know. H ow is it ou t there?”
“ We’re still holding. H ow do you feel?”
“ Dizzy. T h e re ’s a sort of black stuff all aro u n d the sides w hen I see.
Listen, w ill you tell me som ething, if you can, before you go?”
“ Of course.”
“ If a h u m a n ’s leg is broken very badly, w hat I believe they call a
com pound spiral fracture, is it possible for the h u m an doctors to
take ou t a section of the bone an d replace it w ith a m etal substitute?”
“I d o n ’t know ,” 2900 answered. “W hat does it m atter?”
Vaguely 2910 said, “ I th in k I knew of a football player once they
did that to. At least, I seem now to rem em ber i t . .. I had forgotten for
a m o m en t.”
O utside the bugles were blow ing again.
N ear him the dying H O R A R m oaned.
An Am erican news m agazine som etimes carries, ju st inside its front
cover am ong the advertisem ents, a colum n devoted to news of its
105
Planfejt Engineering
ow n people. Tw o weeks after a correspondent nam ed T h o m as filed
the last article of a series w hich had attracted n ational and even
intern atio n al attention, the follow ing item appeared there:
T h e death of a staffer in w ar is no u n iq u e
occurrence in the history of this publication,
but there is a p artic u la r poignancy abo u t that
of the young m an w hose stories, p arad o x ically, to conceal his num ber have been signed
only w ith his nam e (see PRESS). T h e airborne
relief force, w hich arrived too late to save the
cam p at w hich he had resigned his h um anity
to work and fight, reports that he apparently
died assisting the assigned SBS specialist in
caring for the creatures whose lot he had, as
nearly as a h u m an can, m ade his own. Both
he and the specialist were bayonetted w hen the
cam p w'as overrun.
106
Two days before Easter Sunday, at eleven forty-three PM, Stephen
B rodie’s ap artm en t door was broken dow n by a m ixed force,
com prised of elem ents from the New York and P h ila d elp h ia police
departm ents, the Secret Service, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
the Bureau of Narcotics, CBS, ABC, and the Washington Post.
B rodie’s trial began approxim ately six m onths later, on November
seventh.
Perhaps because his was the first arrest to have been carried live on
nation-w ide television, public interest from the very beg in n in g far
exceeded an y th in g know n before. O n the fifth, a late show host
m entioned a rum or to the effect that the trial w ould begin in secret a
day earlier than had been originally announced. A lthough he had
quoted the report only to ridicule it, w hat he said proved sufficient
to fill the street outside the C rim inal C ourts B uilding w ith a mob
estim ated by the police to contain eighty-four th o u san d persons,
in clu d in g m any wom en and children.
O n the seventeenth, the selection of the ju ry began. Both the
P rosecutor’s Office and B rodie’s attorneys were to have u p to three
hun d red dism issals w ith o u t cause, and an u n lim ited num ber of
dism issals for cause. T h e jury — twelve jurors and fifteen alternates —
w ould be chosen from a panel of five thousand persons. Since the
nam es of all these were know n to the p ublic well in advance, it was
inevitable that certain favorites should emerge, based up o n previous
fam iliarity, re latio n sh ip to already w ell-know n persons, appearance,
107
Planfejt Engineering
or m em bership in a p o p u la r or notorious g roup. T im e and
Newsweek published their ideal rolls of twenty-seven as early as June,
and the NBC com puter, fresh from a triu m p h in the p rediction of a
presidential election, presented its ow n list of the fifty “ most
likely” — a list that in the event proved surprisingly inaccurate.
T h e seventeenth was a M onday, and selection co n tin u ed u n til the
follow ing T hursday w ith o u t a ju ro r being accepted, and, indeed,
w ith o u t any p o p u la r favorite com ing under consideration. At
three-fourteen tension was m o u n tin g — H. P iper Davis, a b u ild in g
contractor whose rem ark that “G u ilt or whatever w ould have to be
determ ined by the law ,” made some four m onths previously, had
caught the atten tio n of the m edia, was a mere two nam es off. At this
m om ent, the selection of Em m a M unson, a previously u nnoticed
black B aptist m other’s helper, struck the courtroom like a meteor.
“ No objection,” stated K. B. Parker, the assistant prosecutor. W hen
W ill (Scooter) Clark, the defense attorney, said — in place of the
universally anticipated “objection for cause” — "N o ob jectio n ,”
only the P ublic B roadcasting System was no t caught flatfooted. T h e
fortunate three hundred th o u san d (continental U.S.) w atch in g their
coverage were treated to an in stan t replay w ith no m ore th an a
scarcely perceptible pause for tape editing.
After M u n so n ’s ap p o in tm en t, the re m a in in g tw enty-six ju ro rs were
decided u p o n relatively rapidly. Many observers felt, however, that
this q uick process represented a covert agreem ent between counsel to
avoid insofar as possible further dem onstrations like the Jan u a ry
twelfth (th ro u g h twenty-seventh) riots in San Francisco. T h e
ap p o in tm en t of Charles H op Sing as the th ird regular ju ro r was
widely considered to have been an unacknow ledged surrender to
dem ands of the m ale-grocer-oriental-A m erican com m unity; and
renewed violence am ong the G arm ent Workers, c u lm in a tin g in the
T h ird Avenue brassiere m arch of February eleventh, helped fan a
feeling of n atio n al urgency.
By M arch sixteenth, the selection of the jury was com plete; the
presiding justice, Frederick K. C. M cGrail, ordered a week’s recess
108
A Criminal Proceeding
d u rin g w hich the dom ed Bronco Stadium C om plex was to be
eq u ip p ed w ith additional television cameras, dressing rooms,
perm an en t Mace d istrib u tio n pip in g , a revolving stage, provision for
the in tro d u ctio n of horses and (if necessary) elephants, m eans of
flooding the center section to Row AAC, arm ored m echanical police
(controlled from the gondola that also housed the transm itters
required for a pano ram ic view of the court, and operated by a
com m ittee in clu d in g representatives of the five m ajor networks, the
Senate of the U nited States, and the U niversity of C hicago), a sm all
dirigible to supplem ent the gondola, an aviary for carrier pigeons,
three IBM 380 com puters, recording equipm ent, cooking facilities to
su pplem ent the seven restaurants that formed a perm an en t part of the
sports com plex, a weather station, and black artificial grass
su rro u n d in g a stauros.
O n May third of the follow ing year, the arena was prepared, and the trial proper began. D uring the intervening thirteen m onths, however, com petition for the fuchsia and gold passes that
w ould adm it the bearer had become alm ost u n endurably intense.
Tw enty-four th ousand seven hu n d red h ad been distributed to
Broncos stockholders in full paym ent for the use of the stadium for
as long as required. A nother three hundred com pensated the players
themselves (both platoons) for up to six missed seasons. A llow ing
am ple space for the jury, witnesses, attorneys, and press, left another
three h undred and thirty-six thousand, seven h undred and eighty-one
seats. U pon the P resident’s request, thirteen th o u san d of these were
aw arded to the W hite H ouse staff, both Houses of Congress, the
current g ra d u atin g classes of the four service academies, and the
legislature of the C om m onw ealth of D elaware (her native state).
T h e com petition for the rem ain in g passes was alm ost beyond
com prehension; counterfeiting was u nquestionably responsible for a
substantial part of the difficulties that were to plague adm issions
policies th ro u g h o u t the case.
C ourt was to convene at eleven, but the seating riots and the
counter-violence espoused by the New Venue Rangers, a catch-as-
109
Plan[e]t Engineering
catch-can’t coalition of Broncos fans, private security force officials,
and M others’ Clubs, delayed the first rap of the gavel u n til one
fifty-eight.
T h e o p en in g m otion was m ade by B rodie’s attorney, w ho
requested a new trial, alleg in g certain irregularities in the selection of
the jury. C ourt was recessed to consider the m otion, reconvening on
May thirty-first, w hen Justice H opkins denied it “at this tim e.”
Follow ing the luncheon recess, Deputy Prosecutor Eli Braincreek
began the governm ent’s case. Many seasoned critics noted th at d u rin g
the entire presentation, w hich continued u n til Ju n e tw enty-fifth, the
ABC cam era was fastened unw averingly u p o n the countenance of
Stephen Brodie, the defendant. E ditorials in the Toledo Blade and the
H ouston Post speculated that this fixed regard was a strategy
com pounded w ith the netw ork by B rodie’s lawyers. (Brodie was
reputed to have been a steadfast p artisan of certain ABC presentations
w hen free, notably the “ M onday N ight M ovie.” ) An aging bu t still
boyish com m entator q u ip p ed th at ABC had suffered a jam m ed
swivel (on Ju n e thirteenth, NBC’s only reference to the affair), and
another rival pointed out that since CBS’s cameras provided two
views of Brodie (full face an d three-quarter) CBS’s viewers actually
saw more of him than ABC’s did. (T h is em ploym ent of the word
more was challenged by the jo u rn alism review of the same nam e.)
W hether ABC’s concentrated coverage was justified or not, it m ade
apparent, as no other scrutiny did, the increasing tension to w hich
Brodie was subjected. W hen B raincreek referred for the first tim e to
the private yacht chartered by A ntropopos and arm ed by him w ith
heat-seeking underw ater projectiles, Brodie was observed to wince
visibly; and by the tw entieth of Ju n e, w hen Ethel B. Saltzlust devoted
four hours to the broken a q u a riu m u p o n w hich Brodie was alleged
to have cut his foot w hile skydiving, some thirty m illio n persons
observed the hesitating and even trem ulous m anner in w hich he
extended his hand tow ard Ella M oneypenny-H ubert, the pu rp o rted
m other of his seven adopted Viet N am w ar-orphan heirs.
D uring September, atten tio n left the trial to center on the
110
A Criminal Proceeding
C ongressional debate over the P erkins-O ’Farrell Act, a bill that,
w hen passed (as it was the follow ing m onth), w ould require a
retroactive m andatory death penalty for Charges T hirteen , Fifteen,
Tw enty-O ne, and Twenty-seven in the indictm ent. It was widely
believed that the President w ould veto this bill; but late in the
afternoon of O ctober thirty-first she signed it at her seat in
the stadium , the seventeen sim ulacra of herself im ported from
D isneyw orld-H avana to deceive snipers acting in concert. T h a t n ig h t
Brodie attem pted suicide in his cell, k n o ttin g a strip torn from his
sh irt aro u n d his neck and the bars in his door, and ju m p in g from
his bunk after slashing his wrists w ith fragm ents of his artificial eye
(injuries eerily rem iniscent of those inflicted three years previously
w hen he had been attacked by a dem onic model aircraft —a Second
W orld War B-17—allegedly under the control of Hess DeLobel).
Over a qu arter of a m illio n persons volunteered to give blood, most,
apparently, under the illusion that the d o nation w ould involve an
artery-to-artery m eeting w ith Brodie. (T he actual transfusions came
from a turnkey, R aym ond R. Swain; Swain was assassinated the
follow ing year.)
Two weeks before C hristm as, A rnone H arper, acting for the
prosecution, called to the stand the first of the persons alleged to have
been em ployed for illicit purposes by Brodie and others. T h e witness,
M elinda Bettis, know n professionally as “Fayette City R ed,’’ m ade a
strong im pression on the spectators. Her appearance was followed
by those of W anda Wood, JoA nne Blake, Eve Smythe (“ Nova
D em ure” ), Everett H. W hite (“ Carol C lark ” ), and Sonya P lum
Blossom; Ms. P lu m Blossom testified that both the Secretary of
Defense and the Secretary-General of the U nited N ations had been
present at the party given on board the guided-m issile carrier
Mayaguez Incident d u rin g the special elections. (Later confirm ed by
the G eneral Assembly, th o u g h denied by the Security C ouncil.)
Several witnesses stated that Brodie and others had hoped to gain
w orld-w ide control, both m onetary and m ilitary, on or before the
occasion of the USSA debacle; and Elizabeth Cushy, a witness
111
Plan[e]t Engineering
whose shapely legs, slender waist, and volu p tu o u s decolletage earned
her the highest ratings achieved to that date by any prosecution
presentation, stated under oath that Brodie had told her in confidence
that had the judge not intervened, he had p lan n ed (it being the
previous year) to pack the courtroom w ith persons attached by oath,
as well as by bonds of gratitude, to him self and to Giznik.
Follow ing this testim ony, Justice Russell ordered the court cleared.
T h is required a ten-day recess, d u rin g w hich seventeen thousand
persons (N ew Yorker estimate) were injured, an d a m ausoleum
belonging to Scholia was ap p ro p riated by a thief w ho used its
flam ethrow ers to clear a p a th th ro u g h the Seventh M arines and
dow n Pennsylvania Avenue. T h e m ausoleum was to have been the
p rosecution’s E xhibit C.
O n Jan u ary twenty-fifth the trial reopened, but it closed again
alm ost at once w hen a bom b exploded u n d er the press gallery d u rin g
the mid-day recess. A different kind of bom bshell struck the court on
February fourteenth, w hen Caleb C ohen III, acting for Brodie,
announced that his client was entering a G u ilty plea to Charges
Eight, Sixteen, Seventeen, and Forty-Seven, an d alterin g his plea of
N ot G uilty — insofar as it ap p lied to Tw enty-O ne, Tw enty-N ine,
T hirty, and Forty-Two — to N ot G uilty by R eason of Insanity. All
these changes of plea were refused " in the p u b lic interest,” and on
February tenth, Brodie attem pted suicide a second time.
By m id-M arch the p rosecution’s case was practically com plete.
T h e chiefs of state of the U nited States and five foreign governm ents
(East G erm any, West G erm any, Iran, Sweden, an d Morocco) had
appeared to testify against Brodie; so had eighteen w ell-know n
television personalities. Over three hun d red hours of tape had been
played. T h e fam ous “sly spy film s” had been show n to the ju ry twice
and supplem ented w ith stills show ing Brodie lo o k in g tow ard the
stars (Cassiopeia); Brodie w ith his rig h t arm aro u n d the shoulders
of his (then) wife, A ngella Brodie Yuppe; Brodie m arch in g to protest
the p o llu tio n of the W indw ard Passage; Brodie p lay in g chess in a
store w indow w ith an old m an (Stanislas H enryk C hvojka, black,
112
A Criminal Proceeding
w on in tw enty-eight moves); and Brodie p icking apples in a “ pick
your ow n for three dollars a bushel” deal at A p p le City.
T h e p ro secution’s su m m in g -u p lasted less th an a week, an d on
M arch tw enty-fourth Brodie took the stand in his ow n defense and,
in a surprise move, left it alm ost at once to thru st his arm in to the
![Plan[e]t Engineering (1984) Plan[e]t Engineering (1984)](https://picture.bookfrom.net/img/gene-wolfe/planet_engineering_1984_preview.jpg)











